REDUKSI DATA BERLABEL PADA DETEKSI TUBERKULOSIS BERBASIS CITRA X-RAY MENGGUNAKAN FRAMEWORK SIMCLR
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The development of deep learning-based Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) for tuberculosis (TB) detection faces a fundamental challenge: high reliance on massive annotated data, which requires scarce radiological expertise, considerable time, and high costs. This study proposes a Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) approach via the SimCLR framework as a strategy to reduce labeled data requirements in X-Ray-based TB classification. The model utilizes a ResNet-50 encoder trained contrastively on unlabeled data using the NT-Xent Loss, followed by downstream adaptation via linear probing (SimCLR-LP) and fine-tuning (SimCLR-FT). Utilizing datasets from UPF BBKPM Makassar, evaluations were conducted across four labeled data fractions (10%, 25%, 50%, 100%). Results demonstrated that at the 10% fraction, SimCLR-LP achieved 85.50% accuracy and an AUC of 0.9091, significantly outperforming the Baseline model (62.60% accuracy) which suffered from degenerate prediction. The SimCLR-LP variant achieved ≥80% accuracy using only 60 labeled images, whereas the Baseline required 303 images to reach a comparable threshold, demonstrating a fivefold labeling efficiency. Grad-CAM analysis confirmed that SimCLR-FT yielded localized activations in the perihilar and lower lung lobes, unlike the Baseline's scattered activations without anatomical focus.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[2] L. Alzubaidi et al., “Novel transfer learning approach for medical imaging with limited labeled data,” Cancers (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 7, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/cancers13071590.
[3] I. Martinović et al., “X-ray modalities in the era of artificial intelligence: overview of self-supervised learning approach,” 2025, Canadian Science Publishing. doi: 10.1139/facets-2024-0229.
[4] H. E. Kim, A. Cosa-Linan, N. Santhanam, M. Jannesari, M. E. Maros, and T. Ganslandt, “Transfer learning for medical image classification: a literature review,” Dec. 01, 2022, BioMed Central Ltd. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00793-7.
[5] C. Matsoukas, J. F. Haslum, M. Sorkhei, M. Söderberg, and K. Smith, “What Makes Transfer Learning Work For Medical Images: Feature Reuse & Other Factors,” Jun. 2022, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01825
[6] J. Dominic et al., “Improving Data-Efficiency and Robustness of Medical Imaging Segmentation Using Inpainting-Based Self-Supervised Learning,” Bioengineering, vol. 10, no. 2, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020207.
[7] T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, and G. Hinton, “A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations,” Jul. 2020, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.05709
[8] K. Imagawa and K. Shiomoto, “Evaluation of Effectiveness of Self-Supervised Learning in Chest X-Ray Imaging to Reduce Annotated Images,” Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1618–1624, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-00975-5.
[9] S. Cheng, Z. A. Starosolski, and D. Subramanian, “Self-Supervised Learning for Building Robust Pediatric Chest X-ray Classification Models,” Aug. 2024, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00231
[10] M. R. Hosseinzadeh Taher, F. Haghighi, R. Feng, M. B. Gotway, and J. Liang, “A Systematic Benchmarking Analysis of Transfer Learning for Medical Image Analysis,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2021, pp. 3–13. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87722-4_1.
[11] S. Azizi et al., “Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classification,” Diagnostics, vol. 15, no. 16, Apr. 2021, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05224
[12] S. C. Huang, A. Pareek, M. Jensen, M. P. Lungren, S. Yeung, and A. S. Chaudhari, “Self-supervised learning for medical image classification: a systematic review and implementation guidelines,” Dec. 01, 2023, Nature Research. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00811-0.
[13] L. Ericsson, H. Gouk, C. C. Loy, and T. M. Hospedales, “Self-Supervised Representation Learning: Introduction, Advances and Challenges,” Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1109/MSP.2021.3134634.
[14] I. Matas et al., “Mitigating Overfitting in Medical Imaging: Self-Supervised Pretraining vs. ImageNet Transfer Learning for Dermatological Diagnosis,” May 2025, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16773